Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Online Teaching for Middle and High Schools

  • Hybridization and Distance Education
2
Why Online Education?
  • Pros
  • Alleviates constraints
  • time
  • place
  • scheduling
  • school size
  • class size
    Innovative= Interesting
  • Cons
    • Criticisms
      “impersonal”
    • “non-rigorous”
    • all-the-time
    • everywhere
    • contractual
    • infrastructure
3
Online Education
  • A Brief History
    • Colleges and Universities
    • Corporate Professional Development
    • K-12 (EXAMPLES)
      • Virtual High School (7 years) http://www.govhs.org/website.nsf (pdf)
        • 150 schools; 3000 students; 150 courses
        • Fees for participation (training & sponsorship)
      • Florida Virtual School (2-6 years) http://www.flvs.net/ (pdf)
        • 10,000 students; 65 counties; some out of state
        • No fee in state

4
Online Education
  • ADTECH Consortium http://www.adtech.org/ (pdf)
    • University Classes; High School Classes; Middle School Classes; Exec Dir – Paula Johnson
    • CSUDH – Dr. Warren Ashley (music, art, marine biology, drama)
    • High School – Dr. Ray Gen  (American government; economics)
    • Middle School – Matt Gold (web page design)

5
Who should learn online?
  • Students who
    • enjoy or need independence
    • work at their own pace
      need greater flexibility
    • have special needs
    • GATE/Physical Disadvantages
    • love the technology
    • prefer non-traditional environments
6
Who should not learn online?
  • Students who
      • require frequent face-to-face interaction and supervision
      • are generally not responsible for their own learning
      • rely on traditional social interactions
      • are technologically phobic
7
Successful Characteristics…
    • Virtual Classrooms (pdf)
    • 24/7 Access
    • Real Teacher (no canned programs)



8
Hybrid Classrooms
  • Seamless combination of the best from the F2F and Virtual Classrooms.
    • Discussions; Lecture; Lab; Collaboration; Research;
    • Guided Practice; Assessments; Sample Outcomes

9
Comparing Online & F2F Discussions
  • F2F discussions
    • End when the class ends
    • Discussions may not be remembered
    • Dominated by a few, most do not speak
    • Off-the-cuff
    • Relatively fewer ideas developed


10
Comparing Online & F2F Discussions
  • Online Discussions (pdf)
    • Extends the reach of the classroom 24/7
    • Discussions are permanent and reviewable
    • Mandated participation
    • Premeditated comments
    • Tends to encompass more developed ideas
    • Online discussion do not supplant F2F but augments the capabilities of the classroom
  • Online Chats (Instant Messenger/ICQ) (archived) (pdf)


11
 Lectures, Presentations, Information
  • Disseminations of information and ideas may be augmented by the Internet.
    Scarcity Media


  • www.genconnection.com (pdf)


  • SchoolNotes. Com  (pdf)
12
Labs; Collaboration; Guided Practice
  • Online virtual simulations (www.stocksquest.com)
  • Group projects
  • Lessons & Practice
    WellsFargo.Com
  • Gazillionaire (http://www.gazillionaire.com/gaz.html)


13
Research
14
Electronic Assessment Tools
  • BlackBoard; WebCT; etc. have modules for objective tests.


  • Essay Assessment with Adobe Acrobat



  • ETS – Criterion (pdf)
15
Student Information Systems
  • PowerSchool


  • Aries Eagle


  • SASI Online
  • School Max


  • MAC School


  • School Master
16
Concern: Access
  • What about students who do not have computers at home?
      • It is incumbent upon schools to provide computer access.
      • Inside class assignments can be due on the same day
      • Outside of the class assignments are due anywhere from 1 week to 6 weeks from the date assigned
      • Before, after, and during school access



17
Institutional Infrastructure Needed
  • (a) no time or location restrictions should be placed on online instructors; (b) instructors should be remunerated for their course development and training;
    (c) institutional services should support faculty efforts to serve underserved student populations;
    (d) line-item funding for the support of technology should be budgeted;
    (e) criteria for effective student-teacher contact in the delivery of online curriculum should be established;
    (f) online instruction should not be automated to protect academic quality and rigor, the appropriateness of content, relevance to standards, and dynamic interaction;
    (g) faculty evaluations for both online and face-to-face teachers should be based on peer review;
  • (h) normal operation of online courses should be open and transparent;
  • (i) faculty should be allowed to experiment with online instruction;
  • (j) no faculty member should be forced to teach online;
  • (k) the infrastructure should provide just-in-time technical support;
  • (l) administrative oversight and clerical help should be provided to formalize and codify online instruction and ancillary services;
18
Institutional Infrastructure Needed
  • (m) financial review and oversight should be formalized to ensure program viability;
  • (n) intellectual property and course ownership should be decided in the favor of faculty;
  • (o) online class size should be held to the same standards as their face-to-face counterparts: classes should range from 20 to 50 students;
  • (p) contractual obligations such as office hours, student contact, grading, and class management should be reapplied to online classes;
  • (q) online instructors should monitor classes daily;
  • (r) online instructors should answer e-mail within 24 hours;
  • (s) online instructors should assure student identity and testing security.
  • (t) collaboration between teachers and administrators