Spring 2012
EDES 5252: Methods of Teaching Social Studies
EDES 5253: Methods of Teaching English
Professor: Dr. Ray Gen
Office: google chat
Phone: 310.414.9263 (home)
Fax: 310.640.8079
Email: rgen@esusd.k12.ca.us (day) raygen@gmail.com (evening) docraygen.lmu5253@gmail.com (class assignments ONLY)
Office Hours: online evenings
Catalog Descriptions:
This course addresses the concerns and
needs of future English teachers. Major areas covered include developing a
multicultural curriculum for all students, creating lesson plans, examining
meaning, making strategies for reading, instructing the writing process,
teaching grammar in context, looking at methods of authentic classroom
assessment, and building classroom portfolios.
This
course is designed to provide opportunities for prospective teachers to observe,
develop, and practice a variety of methods to create positive learning
environments, effective discipline, and traditional and alternative assessments.
Emphasis is placed on strategies to include and challenge students with widely
ranging linguistic and academic abilities, diverse learning styles and varying
cultural backgrounds. Methods and content are closely tied to the California
State Framework for grades 6-12.
Course Goals:
http://www.lmu.edu/Page20503.aspx
Teachers will be able to:
¨ Offer all students a challenging learning experience that will help to maximize their individual achievement and provide meaningful opportunities for students to exceed the standards
¨
Offer alternative instructional suggestions and
strategies that address the specific needs of
¨ Identify a clear instructional goal that is related to the English and Social Studies content standards
¨ Design an instructional program that (insert specifics to your content area in terms of logical sequencing of content).
¨ Provide the learning in each instructional year that lays the necessary groundwork for success in subsequent courses
¨ Create and maintain a classroom environment that fosters a genuine understanding and confidence in all students that through hard work and sustained effort, they can achieve or exceed the standards
¨ Identify the most successful and efficient research-based approaches to curriculum and instruction so that learning is maximized
¨ Effectively assess student progress toward the achievement of English and Social Studies standards using multiple measures, and adjust instruction accordingly.
¨
Balance theory, research, and practice.
TPE
1B, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 6C, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
For more information, reference the Standards section of LMU Lesson Plan Template found on Livetext
Mission and Goals, Conceptual Framework, and Dispositions:
For more information on the Mission and Goals, see: http://www.lmu.edu/Page20503.aspx
Conceptual Framework:
Social Justice
Integration of Theory and Practice
Sociocultural/Constructivist Perspective
Culturally
Responsive Pedagogy
Technology
Leadership
Community Collaboration
For more information on the Conceptual Framework, see: http://www.lmu.edu/Page20503.aspx
Professional Dispositions
We strive to be, and educate professionals to be,
educators who:
Ø Respect and value all individuals and communities
Ø Educate by integrating theory and practice
Ø Advocate for access to a socially just education
Ø Lead in order to facilitate transformation
Texts:
English Teachers:
Burke, Jim. (2008) The
English teacher’s companion: A complete guide to classroom, curriculum,
and
the profession. Third Edition.
ISBN-13: 978-0-325-01139-4
ISBN-10: 0-325-01139-7
California English Language Arts Content Standards
Social Studies Teachers:
Zevin, Jack. (2010) Social studies for the twenty-first century: Methods and
materials for teaching in
the middle and secondary schools. Third Edition. New
York: Routledge.
ISBN- 0-8058-5558-0
California Social Studies Frameworks
California History-Social
Science Content Standards
Suggested:
Schmidt, Laurel. (2007) Social studies that sticks: How to bring
content and concepts to life.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Course Requirements:
STANDARDS & THE
INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING (TPE 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
13)
Policy on Class Attendance:
This course is required for a State of
GRADE |
NUMBER OF ABSENCES ALLOWED |
A |
No unexcused absences and no more than one absence excused in advance by the professor for a school-related function or for a medical or family emergency with the knowledge and permission of the faculty member. In the event a second or subsequent “emergency” occurs during the semester, the student may be required to take a grade of “IP” |
A- |
One unexcused absence |
B+ |
One unexcused absence and one excused absence as listed for the “A” |
B |
No more than two unexcused absences |
B-/F |
More than two unexcused absences |
Americans with Disabilities Act: Students with special needs as addressed by the Americans with Disabilities Act who need reasonable modifications, special assistance, or accommodations in this course should promptly direct their request to the Disability Support Services Office. Any student who currently has a documented disability (physical, learning, or psychological) needing academic accommodations should contact the Disability Services Office (Daum Hall Room 224, 310-338-4535) as early in the semester as possible. All discussions will remain confidential. Please visit http://www.lmu.edu/dss for additional information.
Academic Honesty: Academic dishonesty will be treated as an extremely serious matter, with serious consequences that can range from receiving no credit for assignments/tests to expulsion. It is never permissible to turn in any work that has been copied from another student or copied from a source (including Internet) without properly acknowledging the source. It is your responsibility to make sure that your work meets the standard of academic honesty set forth in the “LMU Honor Code and Process” which appears in the LMU Bulletin 2010-2011 (see http://www.lmu.edu/about/services/registrar/Bulletin/Bulletins_in_PDF_Format.htm.) Also, you might include a more specific statement about plagiarism if students will write papers in your class. Suggestions for preventing plagiarism are found at http://library.lmu.edu/Services_for_Faculty/Preventing_Plagiarism__links_for_faculty.htm
Students found
guilty of any offence against academic honesty and integrity are subject to a
failing grade in the course by the instructor.
In addition, students may be suspended or dismissed from the University
upon the recommendation of the Program Director, the Dean of the student’s
college or the Chair of the Graduate Council.
Tentative Nature of the Syllabus:
If necessary, this syllabus and its contents are subject to revision; students
are responsible for any changes or modifications distributed in class or posted
on LMU's course management system MYLMU Connect (if you are using that
technology). Important note to faculty Students should be notified of any
syllabus revisions in the same manner(s) that the original syllabus was
distributed (for example, distributed in writing in class and/or posting on
MYLMU Connect).
Course Evaluations:
Student feedback on this course provides valuable information for continued
improvement. All students are expected to fairly and thoughtfully complete a
course evaluation for this course. This semester, all course evaluations for the
School of Education will be administered online through the Blue™ evaluation
system. You will receive an e-mail notification at your Lion e-mail address when
the evaluation form is available. You may also access the evaluation form on the
MyLMU Connect (https://mylmuconnect.lmu.edu/)
dashboard during the evaluation period.
Written Work:
Written work should be well written, grammatically correct, and conform to the American Psychological Association (APA) style manual, 6th edition. All assignments (with the exception of any assignment submitted via email) should be typewritten and double-spaced.
Policy on Late and
Make-up Work:
Late work will not be accepted without the instructor’s prior permission, and, if accepted, may be subject to a late penalty.
Grading Scale: (based on percent)
93.0%-100% A
89.5%-92.9% A-
88.0%-89.4% B+
83.0%-87.9% B
79.5%-82.9% B-
78.0%-79.4% C+
73.0%-77.9% C
69.5%-72.9% C-
68.0%-69.4% D+
63.0%-67.9% D
59.5%-62.9% D-
0 - 59.4% F
Basic overview:
Discussion - We will discuss theories and practices of our readings and topics.
Show and Tell - We will present and share various projects, lessons, strategies
and plans.
Technology & Practice - We will put into practice the theories, strategies and technologies
we encounter.
Readings - You are not
LOCKED into these recommended readings. If you would rather read something else
that is acceptable. Please provide bibliographic information if you choose
something else.
Post 12 (about one each week) Reading Notes (Cornell, Gen or your own) onto your web site.
F2F Meeting |
TOPIC |
CONCEPTS/ACTIVITIES |
|
DUE Next Meeting |
1 Jan 14
9:30 -noon
|
The Setting Effective Program The California Standards for the Teaching Profession CSTP |
Introductions
·
Syllabus
·
Characteristics
that define an effective, engaging teacher
·
Connection to
Classroom Management Technology: Google Sites
|
Read for next meeting Burke Chp 2, 9 Zevin Chp 1, 2 (Cornell or Gen Notes - post on your web site)
|
1. Create a web site for this class and for your work. (Show & Tell) 2. Design a lesson to be delivered from your web site
3. Notes on readings on your web site |
2 Jan 21 9:30- noon and Jan 29 F2F follow up appointment if needed
|
CSTP Standard 3
Setting the stage for learning. |
Technology: |
Read for next meeting Burke 4, 7 |
1. Create an
original reading strategy or write
one up that you have used successfully.
2. Create a
Backwards Design lesson for any class. 3. Create a
PowerPoint lesson.
|
3 Feb 11
9:30-noon |
CSTP Standard 1
Know your parents Know your community
|
Driven by Achievement Data · School Info (Great Schools)
·
Skills versus
Procedures · Meeting the needs of students who are not at grade level and are at risk of failing (know your learner)
Technology: Google Docs |
Read for
next meeting Burke 17, 18
(Cornell or Gen Notes - post on your web site) |
2. Create a data report in a Google Doc word processor, spreadsheet, or presentation Share it with me and publish it |
4 Feb 18
9:30-noon
|
CSTP Standard 2 Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
|
Reading & Writing
Across the Curriculum
·
Jane Schaeffer
anyone? · Technology: Movie Making
|
Read for
next meeting Burke 12, 13,
25
(Cornell or Gen Notes - post on your web site)
|
1. Create an original writing strategy or write one that you
have used successfully. 2. Create a Socratic Circle
lesson for any class. 3. Create a movie (Show and Tell)
|
Meeting |
TOPIC |
CONCEPTS/ACTIVITIES |
|
DUE Next Meeting |
5 March 3
9:30-noon |
CSTP Standard 5
|
·
Connection to
Bloom’s Taxonomy & the
Objective · Alignment with national, state, local standards · Management & Unit Plan · Grading · Peer Responses (and how to make it work) Google Form Peer Response · Google Docs - Forms · Speaking & Listening Standards
|
Burke 11, 16 Zevin 8, 13 (Cornell or Gen Notes - post on your web site) |
Debate –
Resolve: Has technology improved writing
skills or harmed it? Consider also the collateral discussion regarding
language offshoots such as Ebonics. Should students be able to write in
Facebook or Twitter and do blogs at school? 2. Lesson Plan in LiveText |
6
9:30-noon
|
CSTP Standard 4 Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students
Assessments
|
Grading · Role of Homework · Role of feedback · Vocabulary · Grammar (write your own) More CFG – Zones of Safety & 3 Levels of Text
·
NPR
Spelling Story
|
Read for next meeting
Burke 8, 10
(Cornell or Gen Notes - post on your web site)
|
1. Create a grading form using Google Docs Form sample |
7 Mar 31
9:30-noon |
CSTP Standard 6
Assessments |
· Enduring Understanding Connection to Assessment- Role of effort versus achieving standard · Aligned to Unit Learning Goals · Aligned with Standards & Instruction
· Technology: PDF |
Read for next time
Burke Take Cornell or Gen Notes |
1. Create a PodCast (Show and Tell)
· Technology: Clickers |
8 April 28
9:30-noon |
The
Curriculum
Presentation
of Unit Plans |
|
Read for next time
Take Cornell or Gen Notes - Post on
web site
|
|
UNIT RUBRIC
COMPONENT
|
4 = A (186-200) |
3 = A- (180-185) |
2 = C 143 |
1 = F 100 |
Cover
Page & Organization |
Includes
statement of vision (quote); well organized with thorough and detailed
bibliography (at least 4 sources) |
Includes
statement of vision (quote); organized with detailed bibliography (4 sources) |
Includes
statement of vision (quote); scattered organization with bibliography (2 or 3
sources) |
Does
not include statement of vision (quote); unorganized and/or missing a
bibliography (1 or less sources) |
Table
of Contents |
Includes
table of contents |
Includes
table of contents |
Includes
table of contents |
Does
not include table of contents |
Unit Plan |
Calendar
covers a two-week period with relevant, accurate and clear,
& detailed connections between: · Content Standards · Focus Question · Objective · Assessment · Into · Through · Beyond (Closure) Relevant, accurate and clear,
& detailed description
of unit that connects daily standards,
objectives, and illuminates the Social Justice component. q
Essential question clearly provides the overarching theme. |
Calendar
covers a two-week period with appropriate, relevant, & accurate connections
between: · Content Standards · Focus Question · Objective · Assessment · Into · Through · Beyond (Closure) Appropriate, relevant, & accurate description
of unit that connects daily standards,
objectives, and illuminates the Social Justice component. q
Essential question
provides the overarching theme.. |
Calendar
covers a two-week period with
minimal, limited, cursory, inconsistent
and/or ambiguous connections
between: · Content Standards · Focus Question · Objective · Assessment · Into ·
Through ·
Beyond (Closure) Minimal, limited, cursory,
inconsistent and/or ambiguous description
of unit that connects daily standards,
objectives, and illuminates the Social Justice component. q
Essential question
is not broad enough to provide the overarching theme. |
Calendar
covers a two-week period with inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccurate,
and/or missing connections
between: · Content Standards · Focus Question · Objective · Assessment · Into · Through · Beyond (Closure): Inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccurate,
and/or missing description
of unit that connects daily standards, objectives, and illuminates the Social
Justice component. q
Essential question
is inappropriate |
LMU
Lesson Plans
|
Three
LMU lesson plans that are appropriate, relevant, accurate, clear, detailed & meet all of the following
guidelines: q
Interactive component
included and highlighted q
Tiered instruction
evident & highlighted q
Samples of student work
follow q
One includes a reading
component and is accurately titled q
One lesson involves a
standardized assessment (titled) q
All include detailed
self-reflections One
lesson Plan is submitted on Livetext |
Three
LMU lesson plans that are appropriate, relevant, and accurate
& meet all of the following guidelines: q
Interactive component
included and highlighted q
Tiered instruction
evident & highlighted q
Samples of student work
follow at least three lesson plans q
One includes a reading
component and is accurately titled q
One lesson involves a
standardized assessment (titled) q
All include detailed
self-reflections One
lesson Plan is submitted on Livetext |
Three
LMU lesson plans that are minimal, limited, cursory, inconsistent
and/or ambiguous and/or meet four out of
the six following guidelines: q
Interactive component
included and highlighted q
Tiered instruction
evident & highlighted q
Samples of student work
follow at least three lesson plans q
One includes a reading
component and is accurately titled q
One lesson involves a
standardized assessment (titled) q
All include detailed
self-reflections One
lesson Plan is submitted on Livetext |
Three
LMU lesson plans that are inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccurate, and/or
missing and or meet three out of the six following
guidelines q
Interactive component included
and highlighted q
Tiered instruction
evident & highlighted q
Samples of student work
follow at least three lesson plans q
One includes a reading
component and is accurately titled q
One lesson involves a
standardized assessment (titled) q
All include detailed self-reflections One
lesson Plan is submitted on Livetext |
Assessment
|
Project
and rubric are appropriate, relevant, accurate, clear, & detailed ; effectively
assesses unit goals |
Project
and rubric are appropriate, relevant, and/or accurate;
assesses unit goals |
Project
and rubric are minimal, limited, cursory, inconsistent
and/or ambiguous; unclear connection to unit goals |
Project
and rubric are inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccurate,
and/or missing ; does not assess unit goals |
Self-Reflection
|
1-2
page reflection from your practice that makes appropriate, relevant,
accurate, and clear, detailed (incorporates references) connections
to: q
your strengths q
your areas of growth |
1-2
page reflection from your practice that makes appropriate, relevant,
and/or accurate (incorporates references) connections to: q
your strengths q
your areas of growth |
1-2
page reflection from your practice that makes minimal, limited,
cursory, inconsistent and/or ambiguous (lacks supporting
references) connections
to: q
your strengths q
your areas of growth |
1-2
page reflection from your practice that makes inappropriate, irrelevant,
inaccurate, and/or missing (no references) connections
to: q
your strengths q
your areas of growth |
FINAL UNIT
PRESENTATION (5 minutes- highlight components of handout)
RUBRIC
· Hooks: Hand-out provided for everyone that lists all of your hooks used within the unit
· Interactive Components: Identify your interactive components; highlight your favorite hands-on activity and provide resources (not a hook or motivation- must involve content within your procedure)
·
· Project: Hand-out project sheet and rubric
·
Differentiation: Give a specific example of tiered
instruction
Hand-outs: Provide hand-outs that detail the above components
PROFICIENT 5 points each 35 points |
ACCEPTABLE 4 points each 28 points |
BELOW STANDARD 2points each 14 points |
o Hand-outs provided to the class clearly detailing the following: hooks, explanation of interactive component, reading component, project sheet/rubric, differentiation o Dynamically presented within allotted time |
o Hand-outs provided o Effectively presented within allotted time |
o Unclear hand-outs provided to class and/or missing some required information o Presented and/or goes over allotted time |
All components are present, effectively developed and connections to essential standard are made: o Hooks o Interactive component with template provided for all o Reading Component o Project o Differentiation |
All components are present, but one or more is lacking in development or effectiveness; connections unclear: o Hooks o Interactive component with template modeled o Reading Component o Project o Differentiation |
One or more components are missing or seriously lacking in development or effectiveness; lacks connections: o Hooks o Interactive component without template o Reading Component o Project o Differentiation |