EDUU 605 Democracy, Education and Social Change
Spring 2 2007 –
Ra y Gen, Ed.D.
e-mail:
rgen@esusd.k12.ca.us
(day)
raygen@earthlink.net
(night)
IM: docraygen
office
hours: by appointment
cell: 310.908.1718
|
||
Ann, Janice, Jocelyn, Leslie, Everett |
||
Carol, Dawn, Seana, Celeste, Crystal |
BULLETIN COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Students examine the relationship
between democratic theory, educational practice, and social change. Specific attention is paid to theories of
democracy, the democratic nature of historical and current reform efforts, the
contradictions and dilemmas of schooling, and the ways in which schooling might
influence social change.
COURSE LEARNING
OBJECTIVES
By the end of the course the student
should be able to . . .
1. Craft
personal definitions of democracy, social change, and their relationships.
2. Articulate
a position on the relationship of education, democracy and social change.
3. Describe the democratic ramifications of current school issues such as,
but not limited to, bilingual education, privatization,
standards, sex education, vouchers, testing,
tracking, grading practices, and
core curriculum.
5. Understand
the democratic tensions and ethical dilemmas in daily school/ educational
practice.
6.
Analyze the culture of their
home schools or other work environments in terms of the democratic orientations
and dilemmas with particular
attention paid to race, class,
gender and
multi ethnic issues.
7.
Understand current movement
toward democratic schools and design a democratic action plan for
implementation in their schools.
8. Assess
the status of his or her own democratic personhood.
9. Understand
and conduct research (quantitative, qualitative, participatory as appropriate
and feasible), related to democratic
education.
MAJOR STUDY UNITS:
1. Theoretical
notions of democracy and social change, theories of justice, philosophical
and psychological approaches.
2. Relationships among democracy, social change and education:
can schools build "a new social order" or are the schools reflections
only of existing social arrangements?
3. Identification and analysis of current school issues such as but not limited to bilingual education, privatization, standards, sex education, vouchers, testing, tracking,
grading practices, and core curriculum.
4. School
reform movements and degree of democratic commitment, eg. "good"
schools, Coalition of Essential Schools, etc.
5. Ethical
dilemmas of schooling, issues of race, class, gender, and multi-ethnicity in
daily school practice.
6. Study
and reports of individual schools' democratic orientation.
7. The
"ideal" example of democratic classrooms and schools; designing
democratic action plans for school implementation.
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES:
This course,
to be consistent and internally valid will be democratic and highly
participatory. Student focused, its
methodology includes large and small group dialogue, intensive close reading of
textual material, experiences to foster self-understanding, in- and
out-of-class writing, a collaborative research/action project, the use of video
and other media, and guest speakers who will help us to focus on the democratic
process and education, and what our role in these is. In entering into communication with the
written word through critical reading, the reader is led through a process of
reflection that allows him/her to make meaning from this dialogue with the text
and take action based on the new understandings gained.
Methods of Evaluation:
Students will be assessed
based on the following criteria:
·
50% Class
Participation (Discussions & Presentation
·
50% Class
Papers
REQUIRED TEXTS:
Dewey,
J. (1997). Democracy and education.
Horton, M., & Freire,
P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social
change.
SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT:
Apple, M.W. & Beane, J. (1996). Democratic schools
Kohl, H. (1988). 36 Children.
Kohl., H.
(1994). I won’t learn from you. The New Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children.
Meier, D. (1996). The power of their ideas.
*STUDENT PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS:
Attendance,
preparedness and active participation. Regular class
attendance is important and expected. Students are responsible for all materials
used in class, as well as for any announcements concerning course policy and
important dates.
Written reflections:
Using understandings from Dewey as a frame of
reference, class
members will prepare at least five written reflections or journal entries in
which each critically examines the democratic nature and orientation of her/his
classroom, school or other work place.
These reflections should include:
(1)
the extent to which the individual’s classroom (school, workplace)
reflects democratic processes as outlined in Education and Democracy;
(2)
specific examples to support conclusions arrived at in (1), and
(3)
how understanding of Dewey has contributed to understanding of one’s role
as an educator.
The idea here is to turn the spotlight of creative
reflection on one’s own work – as well as on the larger trends in our
educational system -- using Dewey’s theoretical framework
On-line communication among class members:
Each class member will email to all members of the class
an interesting/relevant resource, website, or article found on the Internet
which supports the notion of democratic education today or which sheds light on
the pedagogy of democratic education.
Book Review Presentation:
Class members in groups, will
read, review, and present to the class in “fishbowl format” their
understandings of the democratic education concepts and methods, and the
historical events discussed by Freire and Horton in We Make the Road by Walking.
Other readings may also be assigned by the instructor.
Democratic
Research Action Project:
Based on the class discussions, class members in groups
of 3 to 4 persons will collaboratively develop and present a democratic
research/action project which applies democratic education principles in their
schools to inform and create change in educational practice and foster a more
democratic, caring and just society.
This critical step in defining and proposing action is the translation
of ideas generated from class discussion and reflection into action
possibilities beyond the Chapman classroom and usually at the school site
level. Projects must be developed in
consultation with the instructor.
Action research is performed in an actual classroom or school, and can
entail the use of surveys, interviews, videos, photos, etc.
ATTENDANCE AND OTHER
CLASS POLICIES
Class
Attendance policies are determined by each instructor and shall be included on
the course outline distributed during the first week of each class. The university recommends as a minimal policy
that students who are absent 20% of the course should be failed.
ACADEMIC
WRITING STANDARDS
Specific writing
standards differ from discipline to discipline, and learning to write
persuasively in any genre is a complex process, both individual and social,
that takes place over time with continued practice and guidance. Nonetheless,
Venues for writing
include the widespread use of e-mail, electronic chat spaces and interactive
blackboards.
Academic writing (as
commonly understood in the university) always
aims at correct Standard English grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
The following details
are meant to give students accurate, useful, and practical assistance for
writing across the curriculum of
Students can assume
that successful collegiate writing will generally:
·
Delineate the relationships among writer, purpose and
audience by means of a clear focus (thesis statements, hypotheses or
instructor-posed questions are examples of such focusing methods, but are by no
means the only ones) and a topic that’s managed and developed appropriately for
the specific task.
·
Display a familiarity with and understanding of the
particular discourse styles of the discipline and/or particular assignment.
·
Demonstrate the analytical skills of the writer rather than
just repeating what others have said by summarizing or paraphrasing
·
Substantiate abstractions, judgments, and assertions with
evidence specifically applicable for the occasion whether illustrations,
quotations, or relevant data.
·
Draw upon contextualized research whenever necessary,
properly acknowledging the explicit work or intellectual property of others.
·
Require more than one carefully proofread and documented draft, typed or computer
printed unless otherwise specified.
DOCUMENTATION
Any material not
original to the student must be cited in a recognized documentation format
(APA, ASA, MLA or Chicago-style) appropriate to the particular academic
discipline. For quick reference to documentation
standards for various fields you may refer to: www.chapman.edu/library/reference/styles.
Deliberate use of information or material from
outside sources without proper citation is considered plagiarism and can be
grounds for disciplinary action. See the
explanation of Academic Integrity below.
ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY
As a learning community of scholars,
Student’s
Name________________________________ Instructor _______________________________
Paper Assignment
______________________________Course Title______________________________
(Instructor: Read the entire paper through then reflect on its merits employing the following criteria. Our goal is to provide guidance to the student progressively in order to improve the quality of his or her writing.)
Criteria |
Comments |
NSW |
Dev |
WD |
The writer demonstrates an
understanding of the assignment by using a style, form and language that is
appropriate for its intended audience. |
|
|
|
|
The writer has chosen a topic in accord with the assignment and
limited it sufficiently to explore in depth in the space allotted. |
|
|
|
|
The paper focuses its presentation by means of a clear statement
of purpose (thesis statement, hypothesis or instructor posed question) and
logically organized sub-topic paragraphs or sections. |
|
|
|
|
The writer
substantiates abstractions, judgments and assertions with specific
illustrations, facts and evidence appropriate to the assignment and/or discipline. |
|
|
|
|
The writer has added to
on-going discussions of the topic with his or her own critical analysis,
rather than simply repeating what others have said through
quotation-stacking, paraphrasing or summaries. |
|
|
|
|
The
writer draws upon research whenever necessary to support critical analysis or
assertions made and properly acknowledges the work of others by utilizing a
standard documentation format acceptable for the course. |
|
|
|
|
The
paper conforms to the minimal essentials of Standard American English
grammar, word choice, spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
N S W = Needs
Significant Work, D = Developing WD = Well Developed
OVERALL RATING
The writer meets the needs
of the particular audience and
succeeds in his or her intended
purpose--honestly engaging the subject and establishing her or his authority by
offering a persuasive and supportable analysis. |
Needs Significant Developing Well Developed Work ô¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾® |
Comments: |
Any
personal learning accommodations that may be needed by a student covered by the
“Americans with Disabilities Act” must be m
QUICK ACCESS TO THE ON-LINE
CHAPMAN LIBRARY RESOURCES
http://www.chapman.edu/library/
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
See “supplemental texts”